Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term
árbitros
Se agradecen los comentarios de los árbitros de la revista.
4 +5 | reviewers | Charles Davis |
4 | referee / reviewer | Robinson Alvarado |
2 | (post-review) adjudicator | Adrian MM. |
Aug 30, 2019 21:03: JohnMcDove changed "Language pair" from "English to Spanish" to "Spanish to English"
Sep 13, 2019 04:16: Charles Davis Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
reviewers
The term "árbitros" is used in some places; "evaluadores" is a somewhat more common term for the same functiom.
"Selección de Árbitros para una Revista de Corriente Principal: Un Asunto Ético
[...[
Siguiendo con el tema del arbitraje de artículos enviados a revistas de corriente principal, comentado en un número anterior de esta revista, la selección de árbitros adecuados para revisar y evaluar un artículo representa siempre un problema no menor para los Editores."
https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=...
"Reviewers" is the most common term in English:
"Becoming a reviewer: how and why
Reviewing requires the investment of time and a certain skillset. Before you decide if you want to become a reviewer, we recommend that you read more about the peer review process and conducting a review."
https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/reviewers/becoming-a-reviewer...
"Journal Reviewers
At Wiley we believe that peer review is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scientific and scholarly research."
https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 36 mins (2019-08-30 21:02:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
It is not at all unusual for authors to acknowledge the comments of reviewers. When the system works well and the reviewers are competent and diligent, their comments can considerably improve the manuscript submitted.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 41 mins (2019-08-30 21:07:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
They can also be called referees, and this term used to be commonly used, at least in the UK, but my impression is that it's less common than it was a few decades ago.
referee / reviewer
https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/types-of-peer-review.html
https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42250/difference-between-referee-and-reviewer-in-the-context-of-journal-manuscript
(post-review) adjudicator
'El resultado del arbitraje tiene tres opciones: aprobado para publicar de forma inmediata, aprobado para publicar si realiza las modificaciones sugeridas por los árbitros y la tercera, es el rechazo del trabajo con los comentarios necesarios del porqué no fue aceptado.'
If the referees’ reports are not in agreement, the paper and the reports are sent to an independent adjudicator (often a member of the journal’s Editorial Board) who is first asked to form their own opinion of the paper .....
http://diccionario.reverso.net/ingles-espanol/adjudicator
http://dela100cia.blogspot.com/2007/05/que-es-una-revista-arbitrada.html
neutral |
Charles Davis
: That is precisely what reviewers for peer-reviewed journals do. The editor requires an explicit verdict along those lines. A reviewer's decision is not final; if it is plainly perverse, it can be overridden by the editor, who is the adjudicator.
2 hrs
|
Yes. You're right - hence my low CL. I threw 'up' the term of adjudicator only for ref. as a natural meaning of the term and an under-used translation.
|
Something went wrong...