Italian term
polsi
3 +5 | pulses | Cristina Bufi Poecksteiner, M.A. |
Non-PRO (1): Rachel Fell
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
pulses
Valutazione e gestione delle lesioni dei tessuti molli nelle fratture chiuse
Sempre a proposito degli indicatori del grado di sofferenza dei tessuti molli, è stato ampiamente dimostrato che le famose 6 «P»
(: Pain (dolore),
Paraesthesia (parestesia),
Paralysis (paralisi)
* Peripheral pulses (polsi periferici assenti) *
e Pallor (colorito cutaneo pallido)
Poikilotermia (diminuzione della temperatura)
che compongono l’algoritmo diagnostico clinico della Sindrome Compartimentale spesso identificano segni o sintomi tardivi rispetto all’ urgenza di uno specifico atto terapeutico (Fasciotomia).
https://www.medicitalia.it/minforma/ortopedia/2465-valutazio...
agree |
Joseph Tein
3 hrs
|
thanks Joseph
|
|
agree |
EleoE
3 hrs
|
thanks Ele
|
|
agree |
Michael Meskers
4 hrs
|
thanks Michael
|
|
agree |
texjax DDS PhD
9 hrs
|
agree |
Cillie Swart
: seems plausible
3 days 18 hrs
|
Discussion
As for this sentence; I suspected it because of the negations in the previous phrases.
If there were none, as Cristina notes, the standard phrasing would indeed be polsi periferici assenti.
Not the case in the screen capture you provided of course.
(It would be easier for me if you re-wrote the text in your question, rather than adding a link that I have to open to read the text.)